Evaluating the Effect of Inulin Supplementary on the Sensory and Textural Properties of Prebiotic Bread (Taftoon)

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Food Biotechnology, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology (RIFST), Mashhad, Iran

2 Master of Science in Food Science and Technology, Cereal Company and Commercial Services Zone 5, Mashhad, Iran

3 Master of Science in Food Science and Technology, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology (RIFST), Mashhad, Iran

4 PhD Student, Department of Food Biotechnology, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology (RIFST), Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Nowadays, studies on the functional and nutritional values of bread are being developed in order to improve these characteristics as well as application of various dietary fibers and prebiotic compounds in bakery products. The aim of this research was application of prebiotic inulin in the formulation and production of functional Taftoon, a kind of Iranian traditional bread widely used in the country, and evaluation of its nutritional value and qualitative effects. For this purpose, specific percentages of wheat flour (ratios of 2, 4, 6 and 8%) were replaced by commercial inulin with average polymerization of 23 and the produced Taftoon was assessed in terms of qualitative characteristics. The results of Farinograph assessment showed that the sample containing 6% inulin received the maximum sensory score for improvement and stability indexes compared with the control sample. Moreover, based on the results the added 6% inulin, regardless of its amount, not only lacked  any negative effect on visual quality and color of bread samples, but also improved the product concerning total titratable acidity, rate of flour water absorption, textural features, owing to its viscoelastic behavior, compared to the control sample. Therefore, using inulin as a well- known prebiotic compound improves the nutritional and healthful characteristics of the traditional bread, Taftoon. However, it did not display any negative effects on rheological and sensory properties of the final product.

Keywords

AACC International. 2010. AACC methods 46-30. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 11th Ed. The St. Paul.
Angioloni, A., & Collar, C. 2011. Functional response of diluted dough matrixes in high-fibre systems: A viscometric and rheological approach. Food Research International, 41(8): 803-812.
AOAC Method. 2003. In official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Ed. Arlington. Virginia.
Bhat, Z.F., & Bhat, H. 2011. Milk and dairy products as functional foods: A review. International Journal of Dairy Science, 6(1): 1-12.
Biesiekierski, J.R., Rosella, O., Rose, R., Liels, K., Barrett, J.S., Shepherd, S.J., Gibson, P.R., & Muir, J.G. 2011. Quantification of fructans, galacto-oligosacharides and other short-chain carbohydrates in processed grains and cereals. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 24(2): 154-176.
Corzo-Martinez, M., Corzo, N., & Villamiel, M. 2007. Biological properties of onion and garlic. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(12): 609-625.
Grajek, W., & Olejnik, A. 2005. Probiotics, prebiotics and antioxidants as functional foods. Acta Biochimica Polonica, 52(3): 665-671.
Gray, J., & Bemiller, J. 2003. Bread staling, Molecular basis and control. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2(1): 1–21.
Gujral, H.S., & Pathak, A. 2002. Effect of composite flours and additives on the texture of chapatti. Journal of Food Engineering, 55(2):173-179.
Hadiyanto, H., Asselman, A., Straten, G.V., Boom, R.M., Esveld, D.C., & van Boxtel, A.J.B. 2007. Quality prediction of bakery products in the initial phase of process design. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 8(2): 285-298.
Hager, A.S., Ryan, L., Schwab, C., Ganzle, M., Doherty, J., & Arendt, E. 2011. Influence of the soluble fibres inulin and oat β glucan on quality of dough and bread. European Food Research and Technology, 232(3): 405- 413.
Henares, J., Francisco, A., & Morales, J. 2006. A new application of a commercial microtiter plate-based assay for assessing the antimicrobial activity of Maillard reaction products. Food Research International, 39(1): 33-39.
Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. 2002. Cereals and its products, characteristics and test methods of wheat flour. No. 103. [In Persian]
Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. 2002. PH measurement, characteristics and test methods for wheat flour. No. 37. [In Persian]
Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. 2002. Sangak Bread, characteristics and test methods of wheat flour. No. 6943. [In Persian]
Izydorczyk, M.S., & Dexter, E. 2008. Barley b-glucan sand arabinoxylans molecular structure, physicochemical properties. International Journal of Food Properties, 41(9): 2850-857.
Karolini-Skaradzinska, Z., Bihuniak, P., Piotrowska, E., & Wdowik, L. 2007. Properties of dough and qualitative characteristics of wheat bread with addition of inulin. Polish. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 57(4): 267-270.
Katina, K., Liukkonen, K.H., Kaukovirta-Norja, A., Adlercreutz, H., Heinonen, S.M., Lampi, A.M., Pihlava, J.M., & Poutanen, K. 2007. Fermentation-induced changes in the nutritional value of native or germinated rye. Journal of Cereal Science, 46(3): 348–355.
Korus, J., Grzelak, K., Achremowich, K., & Sabat, R. 2006. Influence of prebiotic additions on the quality of gluten free bread and on the content of inulin and fructooligosaccharides. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 12(6): 489- 495.
Moore, K.E. 2011. Biological analysis of prebiotics in various processed food matrices. Thesis for the degree of Master of Science. University of Nebraska.
Morris, C., & Morris, G.A. 2012. The effect of inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide supplementation on the textural, rheological and sensory properties of bread and their role in weight management: A review. Food Chemistry, 133 (2):237-248.
Peressini, D., & Sensidoni, A. 2009. Effect of soluble dietary fibre addition on rheological and bread making properties of wheat doughs. Journal of Cereal Science, 49(2): 190-201.
Poinot, P., Arvisenet, G., Grua-Priol, J., Fillonneau, C., Le-Bail, A., & Prost, C. 2010. Influence of inulin on bread: Kinetics and physico-chemical indicators of the formation of volatile compounds during baking. Food Chemistry, 119(4): 1474-1484.
Pourfarzad, A., Haddad Khodaparast, M.H., Karimi, M., & Mortazavi. S.A. 2012. Optimization of gel improver formulation for improvement of Barbari dough and bread properties using response surface methodology. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 12(47): 181-196.
Rosell, C.M., Rojas, J.A., & De Barber, C.B. 2001. Influence of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality. Food Hydrocolloids, 15(1): 75-81.
Schiraldi, A., & Fessas, D. 2001. Mechanism of staling: an overview. 1-17 In: "Bread Staling", (Eds): Chinachoti, P. and Vodovotz, Y. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Skaradzinska, Z., Bihuniak, P., Piotrowska, E., & Wdowik, L. 2007. Properties of dough and qualitative characteristics of wheat bread with addition of inulin. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 57(4): 267- 270.
Sukheesab, K. 2007. Formulation of wheat flour and inulin mix for bread made by different method. A thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Mahidol University. Thailand.
Sun, D. 2008. Computer vision technology for food quality evaluation, Academic press, New York.
Verhagen, J.V. 2007. The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: consciousness. Brain Research Reviews, 53(2): 271-286.
Wang, J., Rossel, C., & Barber, C. 2002. Effect of different fibers on dough performance and bread quality. Food Chemistry, 79(2): 221-226.
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 6, Issue 2
September 2017
Pages 185-198
  • Receive Date: 16 November 2016
  • Revise Date: 01 April 2017
  • Accept Date: 08 April 2017